Collections: using ICT to teach the Cuban Missile Crisis
The Cuban Missile Crisis is a good
opportuntiy to teach pupils about the nature of history- what 'history' is, as
well as developing their knowledge and understanding of the substantive events
of the crisis.
An important characteristic of traditional
history teaching in the United Kingdom, was that history was essentially a
'received subject'. Richard Aldrich (1989) pointed out that it was seen as the
task of the university historian to determine the historical record, and the
job of school teacher, to receive such wisdom and convey it in simplified form
to school pupils.
This form of history teaching was
described by the novelist Penelope Lively in Moon Tiger, (1988: 14-15), where a
dying historian recalls a history class on Mary Queen of Scots:
I put up my hand. 'Please Miss, did the
Catholics think Elizabeth right to cut off her head?' 'No Claudia, I don't
expect they did.' 'Please, do Catholic people think so now?' Miss Lavenham took
a breath. 'Well Claudia', she said kindly, 'I suppose some of them might not.
People do sometimes disagree. But there is no need for you to worry about that.
Just put down what is on the board.'
One of the key breakthroughs, in terms of
fashioning a history curriculum that is relevant, motivating and appropriate to
the needs of young people has been the move away from just 'telling them what
happened'. One of the most radical changes to school history over the past 30
years has been the move from seeing it as almost exclusively about developing
pupils' understanding of the past as a body of knowledge, to being also
concerned with pupils' grasp of history as a form of knowledge.
Lee and Ashby emphasise that this was not
a retreat from the importance of pupils acquiring historical knowledge,
'instead "knowledge" was treated seriously, as something that had to be
understood and grounded. It is essential that students know something of the
kind of claims made by historians and what those different kinds of claim rest
on'. (Lee and Ashby, 2001: 200)
Writing curriculum specifications in
official documents is obviously no guarantee that the specifications will be
delivered in practice, and inspection and research findings suggest that the
teaching of interpretations has been a problematic area of history teaching
over the past decade (Ofsted, 1995, McAleavy, 2000, Culpin, 2002). The teaching
of interpretations is comparatively new to the history curriculum, and there is
a need to disseminate good practice in this area. It is possible that there are
still some history classrooms where pupils are told what happened and
instructed to 'just put down what is on the board.'
ICT makes it easy to put together collections of resources on a particular topic which make it easier to 'problematise' the topic, and make pupils think - about both the topic and the nature of history. The following is a link to a collection of resources about the Cuban Missile Crisis which might help you to do this. Such collections can be particularly important wheh teaching about interpretations and significance, and also when in the territory of evidence and enquiry.
Resources on the Cuban Missile Crisis
References:
Aldrich, R. (1989) Class and gender in the
study and teaching of history in England in the twentieth century, Historical
Studies in Education, Vol. 1, No. 1: 119-135.
Culpin, C. (2002) Why we must change
history GCSE, Teaching History, No. 109: 6-9.
Lee, P. and Ashby, R. (2001) 'Progression
in historical understanding 7-14', in Seixas, P. Stearns, P. and Wineburg, S.
(eds), Teaching, Knowing and Learning History, New York, New York University
Press: 195-220.
Lively, P. (1988) Moon Tiger, London,
Harmondsworth, (quoted in J. Slater, The politics of history teaching: a
humanity dehumanised, London, Institute of Education, University of London).
McAleavy, T. (2000) Teaching about
interpretations, in J. Arthur and R. Phillips (eds) Issues in History Teaching,
London, Routledge: 72-82.
Ofsted (1995) Annual Report of Her
Majesty's Chief Inspector for Schools, London, Ofsted.
|