The government vaccination programme may not be sufficient to achieve herd immunity - even if everyone in the UK is vaccinated - according to new research from the University of East Anglia.
Researchers modelled the effectiveness of UK-wide immunisation programmes using the Oxford and Pfizer vaccines, taking into account the highly transmissible new Covid-19 variant.
They found that the only way to reach herd immunity for the UK would be to vaccinate almost everyone – including children – with the more effective Pfizer vaccine.
They say data for the recently licenced Moderna vaccine would be similar to the Pfizer results.
And the study recommends that all health and social care professionals should receive the 95 per cent effective Pfizer/Moderna vaccines to prevent asymptomatic spread to patients and vulnerable people.
Due to the rapid response nature of this research it has not yet been peer reviewed.
Covid-19 expert Prof Paul Hunter, from UEA’s Norwich Medical School, said: “Getting vaccinated has a huge benefit to you personally. It greatly reduces the risk of serious illness and reduces your risk of symptomatic disease by an estimated 70 per cent for the Oxford vaccine, or 95 percent for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
“But we wanted to find out whether ‘herd immunity’ is a realistic outcome of any immunisation programme with the main vaccines licenced in the UK given that immunisation, even though it can reduce illness, may not prevent all infections.
“And importantly, can these vaccines achieve a sufficient level of population immunity to reduce the reproductive R number to below one in the absence of any non-pharmaceutical interventions?”
The research team used mathematical models of Covid-19 transmission and vaccine efficacy to predict how well the Oxford and Pfizer vaccines will work to bring the R number down and achieve herd immunity.
They initially found that 69 per cent of the population would need to be vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine, or 93 per cent of the population with the Oxford vaccine, to bring the R number below one.
However, when they took into account the new more transmissible Covid-19 variant, they found that vaccinating the entire population with the Oxford vaccine would only reduce the R value to 1.325. Meanwhile the Pfizer vaccine would require 82 per cent of the population to be vaccinated to control the spread of the new variant.
Modeller Prof Alastair Grant, from UEA’s School of Environmental Sciences, said: “The Oxford vaccine reduces the incidence of serious illness to a greater extent than it reduces symptomatic illness, which is still common in those who have had this vaccine.
“Its efficacy against the incidence of asymptomatic infections is lower, reducing its efficacy against all infection from 70.4 per cent to 52.5 per cent for the pooled data. This means that its overall protection against infection is only partial - around 50 per cent.
“Although asymptomatic cases are less infectious, including this in our calculations still raises R values by 20 per cent or more, from 1.33 to 1.6 for the new variant with a 100 per cent vaccination.
“This combination of relatively low headline efficacy and limited effect on asymptomatic infections means that the Oxford vaccine can't take us to herd immunity, even if the whole population is immunised.
“Vaccinating 82 per cent of the population with the Pfizer vaccine would control the spread of the virus - but it isn't licenced for use on under 16s, who make up 19 per cent of the population.
“Also, some people will refuse the vaccine, so achieving an 82 per cent vaccination rate will likely be impossible. In the absence of vaccination, ‘herd immunity’ would only occur when 89 per cent of the population has had the virus.”
Prof Grant added: “We know that a substantial fraction of those who have been vaccinated or have had a natural infection can still become infected and pass the virus on others.
“It is very worrying that vaccinated but asymptomatically infected people could still pass Covid-19 on to those who have not been vaccinated, and particularly those who may be immunocompromised.
“For this reason, we recommend that health and social care workers, and others who have lots of contacts with those vulnerable to infection, should receive one of the mRNA vaccines in preference.
“The Oxford vaccine will no doubt be an important control intervention, but unless changes to the dose regime can increase its efficacy, it is unlikely to fully control the virus or take the UK population to herd immunity.”
Prof Hunter added: “If we cannot achieve herd immunity, vulnerable unvaccinated individuals will remain at risk. We do need to consider how best to protect these individuals when social restrictions are eventually relaxed as the result of a successful vaccine roll out programme.”
Prof Hunter was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) and collaboration with the University of East Anglia.
‘Immunisation, asymptomatic infection, herd immunity and the new variants of COVID 19’ is published on the MedRxiv preprint server.
Air filtration systems do not reduce the risk of picking up viral infections, according to new research from the University of East Anglia.Read more
A project to support patients with their hip and knee replacement recovery using wearable technology has been shortlisted for a national innovation award.Read more
Six UEA professors have been named in the annual Highly Cited Researchers list for 2023, which celebrates some of the most influential researchers in the world today.Read more