Study examines how civil wars affect wildlife populations

Published by  Communications

On 14th Sep 2020

Soldiers in a savannah

A new study comprehensively reveals how civil wars impact wildlife in countries affected by conflict.

Researchers at the University of East Anglia (UEA), in the UK, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), Brazil, and University of Agostinho Neto (UAN), Angola, found that the main impacts of civil wars on native mammals are often indirect, ultimately arising from institutional and socio-economic changes, rather than from direct military tactics.

Increased access to automatic weapons and suspension of anti-poaching patrols were leading causes of wildlife population collapse, while installation of military bases within core conservation areas, overhunting of large-bodied mammals, and new settlements of displaced refugees also strongly impacted species.

Published today in the journal Nature Scientific Reports, the study suggests that civil wars in low-governance countries can have both positive and negative impacts on native wildlife populations depending on space and time scales, but the overall trend is negative.

The authors warn that even during post-war peace times, wild mammal populations will fail to recover as long as rural people living in war-torn countries remain armed and wildlife management regulations cannot be enforced. They call for robust international policies that can prevent the consequences of warfare, warning that restoring depleted wildlife populations may take many decades and require active intervention efforts.

Civil wars often coincide with global biodiversity hotspots, however little is known about how they affect wildlife. This study drew local ecological knowledge to assess for the first time the main consequences of a prolonged civil war in Southwest Africa on forest and savannah mammals, using Angola as a case study. The country is home to at least 275 species of mammals, many of them historically hunted by the local communities before, during and after the intermittent 27-year Angolan civil war (1975–2002).

In Angola’s main protected area, Quiçama National Park and Quiçama Game Reserve, the abundance of 20 out of 26 wild mammal species studied was 77 per cent lower after the war compared to the pre-war baseline, particularly for large-bodied species such as elephants in open-savannah environments. Significantly, this decline was not reversed by the end of the post-war period (2002-2017).

Franciany Braga-Pereira, a Zoology PhD candidate at UFPB, led the study. Ms Braga-Pereira said: “Currently, 36 countries worldwide are experiencing civil wars and most of these conflicts are either fuelled or funded by international interests or began after an external intervention.

“These internationalized conflicts are more prolonged and less likely to find a political resolution. Therefore, considering measures that can reduce the impact of warfare on wildlife, we emphasize the intentional or inadvertent complicity of foreign powers, which should promote policies that mitigate the detrimental environmental impacts of armed conflicts.”

Co-author Prof Carlos Peres, from UEA’s School of Environmental Sciences, said: “Low-governance developing countries are struggling as it is, even during peacetimes, to protect their wildlife resources, never mind the colossal adverse consequences of breakdown in law-and-order brought about by a civil war. Yet there are no adequate international mechanisms to deploy peace forces to maintain the status quo of vulnerable wildlife populations in troubled parts of the world.”

The research involved interviews with expert local hunters, which revealed that large-bodied mammals, such as red buffalo, kudu and red sable, were preferred targets that had been overhunted during the war. As their populations became increasingly depleted, the size structure of prey species gradually shifted towards smaller-bodied species, for example bushpig, bushbuck kewel and blue duilker, during the post-war period.

However, once the depletion in forest was lower than in the savannah, hunters operating in forest areas were occasionally able to kill larger species in the post-war period.

In their model of how civil wars impact wildlife, the authors explain that civil war could be a double-edged sword, resulting also in declines in extractive industries such as oil, mining and agribusiness, which can benefit wildlife, and demilitarized and landmine zones, which severely discourage human settlements and game hunters, thereby creating potential game refuges as passive ‘no-take’ areas.

Warfare-induced mammal population declines in Southwestern Africa are mediated by species life history, habitat type and hunter preferences’, Franciany Braga Pereira, Carlos A Peres, João Vitor Campos Silva, Carmen Van Dunem Santos and Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves, is published in Nature Scientific Reports on September 14.

Latest News

  News
Health care worker in PPE knelt against wall with head in hands
16 Oct 2020

The mental health impact of pandemics for front line health care staff

Mental health problems such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, anxiety and depression are common among healthcare staff during and immediately after pandemics –...

Read more >
  News
Cancer cells reproduction
15 Oct 2020

£2 million for UEA’s Future Leaders

From drug discovery to cancer treatment, two University of East Anglia research projects are set to benefit from a UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) award worth...

Read more >
  News
Freshwater carp feeding with sunlight reflecting off of the surface of the water
15 Oct 2020

Australian carp virus plan 'dead in the water'

Plans to release a virus to reduce numbers of invasive Common Carp in Australia are unlikely to work and should be dropped – according to new research involving...

Read more >
Are you searching for something?
  News
Man vaping and exhaling smoke against black background
14 Oct 2020

E-cigs better than gum or patches to help people quit smoking

Electronic cigarettes could increase the number of people who stop smoking compared to nicotine replacement therapy – such as chewing gum and patches – according...

Read more >
  News
09 Oct 2020

UEA community celebrates four awards in Queen's Birthday Honours

Four pioneering female members of the University of East Anglia’s (UEA’s) community have been recognised for their lifelong work in the Queen’s Birthday Honours.

Read more >
  News
Two girls using a tablet
08 Oct 2020

New online hub launched to help keep more than 2 million vulnerable children safe

A digital service designed to help society’s most vulnerable children and young people who are disproportionally at greater risk of online harm has been launched...

Read more >
  News
Tractor fertilizer spreader in young wheat field
07 Oct 2020

N2O emissions pose an increasing climate threat, finds breakthrough study

Rising nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions are jeopardizing the climate goals of the Paris Agreement, according to a major new study by an international team of...

Read more >
  News
Care home worker wearing PPE holding seated elderly woman's hands
07 Oct 2020

Norfolk care homes to benefit from £1.2 million UEA project

Researchers at UEA will be part of a £1.2 million government-funded project to improve care in residential homes, which were hard-hit by the Covid-19 crisis.

Read more >
  News
Dr Michael Houghton receiving his Honorary Graduate degree at UEA
06 Oct 2020

UEA graduate awarded Nobel Prize for Medicine

UEA alumnus and Honorary Graduate Dr Michael Houghton has been awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for his work into the discovery of the Hepatitis C virus,...

Read more >
  News
Partial view of woman holding cardboard large intestine
02 Oct 2020

Could a poo transplant one day be the secret of eternal youth?

Faecal transplants could one day be used as a therapy to restore cognitive function in the elderly – according to new research from the University of East...

Read more >