|
|
 
|
Linking the Biogeochemical Cycles of Nitrogen and
Sulphur as Part of the Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT)
by Tom Bell email
It has long been established that the cycles of reduced
nitrogen and sulphur in the surface of the open ocean are driven by biological
processes. Reduced sulphur (DMS) and nitrogen (NH3) gases emitted
by the ocean can undergo chemical reactions to form particles in the atmosphere;
these particles are composed of approximately equal amounts of nitrogen
and sulphur species 1, indicating approximately equal rates of
emittance from the ocean. This suggests that the elemental cycles between
the surface ocean and lower atmosphere are coupled. A greater understanding
of this is particularly important as aspects of these cycles can potentially
affect cloud water acidity (and hence processing within the cloud) and the
flux of solar radiation reaching the ocean surface. My PhD involves research
cruises as part of the Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT) project; these
cruises provide a fantastic opportunity to study, test and develop ideas
concerning the nitrogen and sulphur cycles.
Sulphur
(see figure 1)
The volatile compound dimethylsulphide (DMS) is the
major source of biogenic sulphur to the marine atmosphere. Dimethylsulphoniopropionate
(DMSP) is directly synthesised by phytoplankton and this is readily broken
down into DMS and acrylate in the surrounding seawater. DMSP production
varies significantly between phytoplankton species. At the same time, numerous
trophic interactions control DMS production and destruction, complicating
the reduced sulphur cycle.
The dominant oxidation product of gaseous DMS - sulphur
dioxide (SO2), has been shown to influence the solar radiation
flux by reflecting and refracting the sun's radiation. This can occur either
directly, as gaseous SO2, or upon further oxidation to a sulphate
(SO42-) aerosol, which attracts moisture from the
air, creating Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN). In 1987, Charlson et al.
put forward the hypothesis that oceanic phytoplankton might be regulating
the climate through DMSP, and hence DMS, production (figure 1). Since Charlson
and co-authors published their paper, extensive research has been carried
out asking critical questions. Of particular importance were: 'Why and how
is DMSP produced?' and 'What are the pathways by which DMSP is broken down
into DMS?'. It is important to understand the answers to these questions
as they will eventually lead us to understand how and why DMS emissions
from the ocean can vary so much over spatial and temporal scales and if
there really is a climate-regulating feedback loop. I will not go into our
current understanding regarding these questions but recent, comprehensive
reviews are available in the literature3-5.
Nitrogen
(see figure 2)
In the surface ocean, an equilibrium exists
between gaseous ammonia (NH3(g)) and its protonated form, ammonium
(NH4+(aq)). This equilibrium is pH dependent
and, as the surface oceans are ~pH 8, ammonium is the dominant form (NH3:NH4+
~ 1:9). NH4+ (along with other forms of nitrogen)
is a key nutrient for primary production and is intensely cycled within
the euphotic zone.
The rate of air-sea exchange of gaseous
ammonia is at least partially controlled by the concentration gradient across
the air-sea interface. Whether the concentration in the air exceeds the
concentration in the surface ocean will directly affect the direction of
gaseous exchange. The nitrogen cycle is severely perturbed due anthropogenic
activities; modern agricultural practice and industry have significantly
increased concentrations of NH3 in many environments, including
the atmosphere. It is generally accepted that the further a site is from
a source of such pollution, the lower the atmospheric concentration is likely
to be and the more likely the flux will be out of the ocean rather than
into it. Until recently, quantifying the direction and intensity of the
air-sea flux of nitrogen has been difficult as simultaneous sampling in
the atmosphere and ocean rarely takes place. In the atmosphere, NH3
reacts with acids to form ammonium salts, which then attract water and,
in the same fashion as SO42-, produce Cloud Condensation
Nuclei (CCN). This not only affects the radiative flux reaching the ocean
surface, but also influences the amount of nitrogen deposition back into
the oceans (figure 2).
Interaction
of the Nitrogen and Sulphur Cycles (see figure 3)
The amount of nitrogen reaching the ocean
on a global scale is not well known, but
in some remote environments will almost certainly be a major limiting factor
for phytoplankton growth. At the same time, the flux of radiation is important
to algae in the surface ocean because they use it as a light source. Understanding
the interaction of the nitrogen and sulphur cycles and their potential influence
on climate and surface ocean biology is of important. In the atmosphere,
the aerosols of ammonia and sulphate readily combine to form potent CCN.
The various factors affected
by the interaction of these cycles (as mentioned previously and shown
in figure 3) either comprise or add weight to the CLAW hypothesis1
(i.e. that there are numerous feedback mechanisms in place which attempt
to maintain a constant radiative flux). It should be noted that figure
3 not only simplifies the reduced nitrogen and sulphur cycles, but also
does not include the numerous interactions with many other nutrient cycles
(e.g. iron, silicate, phosphorous).
Aim
To quantify the air-sea exchange of NH3
and DMS through simultaneous lower atmosphere and surface ocean measurements,
and hence gain insight into the complex set of interactions outlined
in figure 3. |
How?
My PhD involves me taking part in the Atlantic Meridional
Transect (AMT) project. Every year, the Royal Research ship, the James Clark
Ross (JCR), sails from the UK to Antarctica and back in order to resupply
the various British Antarctic Survey stations; it travels southward in the
N. hemisphere's Spring, and returns in the Autumn (figure 4).
AMT makes use of this passage by sending researchers to take measurements
between the UK and the Falkland Islands (the JCR's last/first port of call
before/after Antarctica). The project involves a coherent set of coupled
atmospheric and ocean measurements which will define the surface water biogeochemistry,
phytoplankton, zooplankton and bacterial production, atmospheric aerosol
and gas concentrations. This provides an excellent framework within which
to interpret the DMS and NH3 data I will collect (with particular
assistance from Dr. Alex Baker and Malcolm Woodward) during 3 of these research
cruises (each lasting approximately a month). For further information, see
the AMT website at http://www.pml.ac.uk/amt/.
Application?
My research will have many uses:
- An
increased understanding of how our climate may react to the perturbations
we are causing in natural elemental cycles (including other cycles such
as the carbon cycle)
- An
extensive data set which will be of great use to modellers, helping
them to build more comprehensive models predicting future climate change
scenarios.
- An
improved understanding of any potential relationships between DMS concentrations
and other parameters measure by satellite (all attempts have thus far
proved unsatisfactory). Should such a relationship be found, it would
enable an accurate method of scaling up fluxes.
- Increased
understanding of any relationships between DMS concentrations and other
water column parameters (e.g. pigments, phytoplankton speciation, etc.)
- Increased understanding
of the global NH3 cycle.
Thanks go to my supervisors - without which there
would be no project!
Further Reading
- Quinn,
P. K., Bates, T. S., Johnson, J. E., Covert, D. S. & Charlson, R.
J. Interactions between the Sulfur and Reduced Nitrogen Cycles over
the Central Pacific-Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres
95, 16405-16416 (1990).
-
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O. & Warren, S. G.
Oceanic Phytoplankton, Atmospheric Sulfur, Cloud Albedo and Climate.
Nature 326, 655-661 (1987).
-
Simo, R. Production of atmospheric sulfur by oceanic plankton: biogeochemical,
ecological and evolutionary links. Trends in Ecology & Evolution
16, 287-294 (2001).
-
Stefels, J. Physiological aspects of the production and conversion of
DMSP in marine algae and higher plants. Journal of Sea Research
43, 183-197 (2000).
- Kiene,
R. P., Linn, L. J. & Bruton, J. A. New and important roles for DMSP
in marine microbial communities. Journal of Sea Research 43,
209-224 (2000).
Tom Bell
March 2004
|
|