Rural Property Network

Click to download the programme for 'Workshop on Rural Property and Inequality' - PDF
Click to download the programme for 'Workshop on Rural Property and Inequality' - MS Word

The Rural Property Network offers a platform for substantive exchange among scholars working on contemporary processes of rural transformation and differentiation.

Contemporary processes of rural change radically transform rural property relations, differentiating rural people’s rights to material and cultural values. The concrete processes of rural transformation and differentiation take different forms, just as we use different terms to describe these transformations. Research in postcolonial settings highlights the ambiguity of local property relations as a consequence of nation-building and development. Research taking place in post-socialist societies focuses on how concrete property practices define the rights and obligations associated with rural values. Research in Western Europe emphasizes the increasing differentiation of the countryside driven by local reactions to the transformation of agriculture and changing structure of rural society.

Property theory offers a language to examine these seemingly diverse processes of rural change. This network seeks explicit comparisons of empirical cases and theoretical work from the three settings by way of three leading questions. 

• How do contemporary processes of rural change redefine the social actors recognized and legitimized in property relationships?
• How does contemporary rural change modify the goods of material and symbolic value important to social actors? 
• How have the types of relationships, including rights and obligations, asserted by social actors changed in the process of rural transformation?

The network currently includes 15 scholars who have conducted fieldwork on rural transformations in postcolonial, post-socialist, and Western European settings. They come from anthropology, development studies, (rural) sociology and institutional economics and work at universities in Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK.

The network meets on a regular basis.

• The first workshop facilitated a first exchange among network members and planning of subsequent workshops (Berlin, Germany, April 2005).
• The second workshop examined rural change with an emphasis on the re-valorization of property objects and institutionalization of (new) property rights (Torun, Poland, September 2005).
• The third workshop looked at the effects of transnationalization and globalization on access to natural resources (Halle, Germany, March-April 2006).
• The fourth workshop discussed conceptual issues around property and access to natural resources (Bornholm, Denmark, September 2006).

The network participants currently work on the publication of three special journal issues. 

• Marianne Penker and Lutz Laschewski edit an issue on 'Rural change: re-valorization of property objects and the institutionalization of (new) property rights' for the International Journal of Agricultural Resource, Governance and Ecology. 
• Bertram Turner and Melanie Wiber serve as guest-editors for a special issue on 'Paradoxial Conjunctions: access to resources in a transnational environment' in Anthropologica. 
• Thomas Sikor and Christian Lund have proposed a special issue on 'Property and access to resources' to Development and Change.

The Rural Property Network has received financial support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Max Planck Society, and Roskilde University.

Contacts:

Thomas Sikor, School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, UK

Lutz Laschewski, Institute for Rural Development, Rostock University, Germany

Bertram Turner, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Germany